Q:
A New York state resident establishes an irrevocable trust
for the benefit of the resident’s child, who also lives in
New York. The trustee is the resident’s attorney, living in
New Jersey. The trust’s only asset is a brokerage account
containing stocks, bonds and a money market fund. The account
was established at a New York brokerage firm. Is the trust
taxable in New York?
A:
The trust is a resident New York trust that is not taxable
in New York. New York tax law (sec. 605(b)(3)) defines a resident
trust in part as an irrevocable trust having property “of
… a person domiciled in this state at the time such a trust,
or portion of a trust, became irrevocable …”
However,
section 605(b)(3)(D) of the tax law exempts from New York
taxation any resident trust where all the trustees are domiciled
outside of New York, the entire corpus of the trust is outside
of New York and all the income and gains are from sources
outside of the state.
The location
of intangible property, such as stocks, bonds or money, is
in the state where one or more of the trustees are domiciled.
The above
trust is a resident New York trust because a New York domiciliary
irrevocably established the trust. The location of the trustees
or of the beneficiaries is irrelevant when determining the
residency of the trust.
However,
since the trustee of the above trust is a resident of New
Jersey, the assets are all intangibles and there is no New
York source income, the trust is not taxable in New York and
therefore need not file a New York fiduciary income tax return.
Q:
Does the transfer of a remainder interest from a life estate
require that a gift tax return be filed?
A:
Yes. Under Code Section 2511(a), any transaction in which
an interest in property is gratuitously passed or conferred
upon another, regardless of the means or device employed,
is subject to gift tax (Reg. Section 25.2511-1(c)).
In addition,
the transfer must be complete and irrevocable before the gift
tax applies.
For example,
a donor was deemed to have made an incomplete gift when he
transferred his personal residence to his sons and retained
not only a life estate in the property, but also the right
to have his personal residence transferred back to him (PLR
200308046).
A gift
of a future interest, such as a remainder interest in a life
estate, is not eligible for the annual exclusion for gifts,
currently $12,000. Calculating the value of the gift to be
reported entails applying to the fair market value of the
property the appropriate remainder factor based on the age
of the transferor and the applicable IRC Section 7520 rate
for the month in which the gift was made (see IRS Publication
1457).
Top
of Page
Accounting
and Review Services Committee
Q:
If we issue a compilation report omitting all disclosures,
can we include an emphasis paragraph in the compilation report?
A: No, unless the matter is disclosed in the financial
statements. Paragraphs 49 and 50 of Statements on Standards
for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS) 15 state that because
an emphasis paragraph should not be used in lieu of management
disclosures, an accountant should not include an emphasis
paragraph in a compilation report on financial statements
that omits substantially all disclosures unless the matter
is disclosed in the financial statements.
An accountant
may include an emphasis paragraph on a matter when management
has presented selected information even though substantially
all disclosures have been omitted, as long as the matter discussed
in the emphasis paragraph is disclosed in the selected information.
Q:
In a compilation or review engagement, what is the accountant’s
responsibility in communicating to management if a CPA finds
evidence or information regarding fraud or an illegal act
that may have occurred?
A: Paragraph 61 of SSARS 12 states that when evidence
or information comes to the accountant’s attention during
the performance of compilation or review procedures that fraud
or an illegal act may have occurred, that matter should be
brought to the attention of the appropriate level of management.
The accountant need not report matters regarding illegal acts
that are clearly inconsequential and may reach agreement in
advance with the entity on the nature of such items to be
communicated.
When matters
regarding fraud or an illegal act involve senior management,
the accountant should report the matter to an individual or
group at a higher level within the entity, such as the manager
(owner) or the board of directors. The communication may be
oral or written. If the communication is oral, the accountant
should document it.
When matters
regarding fraud or an illegal act involve an owner of the
business, the accountant should consider resigning from the
engagement. Additionally, the accountant should consider consulting
with his or her legal counsel and insurance provider whenever
any evidence or information comes to his or her attention
during the performance of compilation or review procedures
that fraud or an illegal act may have occurred, unless such
illegal act is clearly inconsequential.
Q:
Can we issue a review report on financial statements that
omit disclosures?
A:
No.
Paragraphs 16 through 18 of SSARS No. 1, which provide guidance
for reporting on statements that omit substantially all disclosures,
only apply to financial statements that the accountant has
compiled.
Q:
Are the titles “Balance Sheet” and “Statement of Income” appropriate
for statements prepared using a comprehensive basis of accounting
other than Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP),
meaning Other Comprehensive Basis of Accounting (OCBOA)?
A:
No, unless the titles are modified. Such unmodified titles
are generally understood to be applicable only to financial
statements that are intended to present financial position,
results of operations or cash flows in conformity with GAAP.
Paragraph
4 of SSARS No. 1 refers to SAS No. 62, paragraph .07 (AU section
623.07), which provides guidance with respect to suitable
titles for financial statements that are prepared in conformity
with OCBOA other than GAAP.
Top
of Page
Auditing
Standards Committee
Q:
What are the current CPA firm responsibilities concerning
fraud in performing review-level services on a client financial
statement issued pursuant to a SSARS engagement, including
consideration of documentation through the use of checklists
or programs? And will the lengthy and detailed fraud checklist
for this type of engagement be time-consuming to prepare?
A:
The Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review
Services were amended by SSARS No. 12 in December 2005 to
parallel changes made in the Auditing Standards (SASs) to
better clarify CPA and client responsibilities concerning
fraud when a CPA is engaged for services in which historical
client financial statements are issued.
The amendment
to SSARS was designed to similarly emphasize terminology and
concepts concerning fraud in the revised audit literature,
which are principally to be reflected in revisions to the
structure of engagement letters with management and representation
letters received from clients.
The CPA’s
engagement cannot be relied upon to disclose errors, fraud
or illegal acts that may exist. However, the CPA will inform
the appropriate level of management of any material errors
and any evidence or information that comes to his/her attention
during performing procedures under SSARS that fraud may have
occurred.
In addition,
the CPA will report any evidence or information regarding
illegal acts that may have occurred, unless they are inconsequential.
Management
is responsible for the prevention and detection of fraud,
and that it has no knowledge of any fraud or suspected fraud
affecting the entity involving management or others where
fraud could have a material effect on the financial statements,
including any communications received from employees, former
employees or others.
Accordingly,
while the CPA has an awareness of fraud in performing a review
or a compilation under current standards, it is not contemplated
that he or she will necessarily design procedures to detect
material misstatements due to fraud or illegal acts.
Based
on the nature and limitations of engagements performed under
SSARS, documentation in work files is limited. For example,
in a review such documentation would include an engagement
letter evidencing an understanding with the client and a representation
letter. It would also include documentation of the accountant’s
knowledge of the client’s business and the accounting principles
and practices in the industry in which it operates, as well
as his/her inquiry and analytics procedures and unusual matters
related thereto and their disposition.
However,
while use of a checklist concerning certain of these matters
may be useful, SSARS does not specify the form or content
of working papers. Accordingly, while a checklist concerning
fraud might be useful, it is not required in a review, and
care should be taken in selecting a checklist appropriate
to the level of service being performed, which is less than
an audit.
Such practice
aids are available from secondary sources commonly accessible
outside the actual SSARS literature.
Top
of Page
Agri
Business Committee
Q:
For cash-method taxpayers, what are the IRS’s general
rules for deductible prepaid expenses for livestock and farming
operations?
A: Expenditures must be for a purchase rather than
a deposit, and the prepayment must be made for a business
purpose and not tax avoidance. The deduction will not result
in a material distortion. Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section
464(f) limits deductible prepaid farm supplies to 50 percent
of deductible farm expenses for the year.
Q:
For cash-method farming operations, what are the general rules
for inventory?
A: Generally, the purchase price and other acquisition
costs of the animals, and cost of seeds, plants, trees and
vines with a preproductive period of more than two years must
be capitalized, but the cost of raising animals and raising
crops can be deducted when expensed. Special preproductive
rules apply to timber and Christmas trees. When the farming
operations are part of an integrated business not considered
farming and requires inventories, the farming operations may
be required to use inventories.[(IRC Regulation 1.466-1-(d)(1)].
Top
of Page
Litigation
Services Committee
Q:
When a CPA takes on a litigation support engagement whereby
he would be working for his current client and his current
client’s attorney, would the CPA put himself in a conflict
of interest situation when he identifies himself as an expert
who is independent? As an expert, would the CPA have to rely
upon the books and records of the company and/or the tax returns,
both of which he was involved in preparing?
A: What arises with Kovel relationships is that practitioners
sometimes forget that since the Kovel is a privileged relationship
with the client and the client’s attorney (whereby the
Kovel accountant is effectively working as a part of the attorney’s
staff), the CPA must watch that the entire relationship won’t
be defeated by the preparer or other obligations. As a preparer,
work product is discoverable; as a Kovel accountant, the work
product is protected as attorney-client work product. If you
try to be both, you will probably end up in a no-win situation
where your only friend may be your malpractice carrier.
Top
of Page
Real
Estate Committee
Q:
What is the tax impact of a real estate partnership in which
the partners have refinanced and are about to redistribute
the money?
A: There is generally no tax due on debt-financed
distributions. The liabilities associated with the refinancing
give the partners additional basis to distribute. The partnership
is subject to interest-tracing rules on these debt-financed
distributions.
Depending
on a number of factors, including the amount of the distributions
and the operating expenses of the partnership, the characteristic
of the partnership’s interest expense is subject to
change. Normally, the interest expense would be treated as
passive, like any real estate rental activity. However, if
tracing is applicable, the individual partners receiving distributions
must determine what kind of interest expense is related to
the distribution based on what they do with the distribution.
If the money is deposited into stocks and bonds, it would
be investment interest. If used to invest in real estate,
it would retain its passive character. If it is used to buy
a boat, it would be personal interest, and therefore nondeductible.
Top
of Page
Employee
Benefits Committee
Q:
How should bonuses paid after year-end be handled for both
income tax deduction and Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section
409A purposes?
A: Employers frequently pay annual bonuses after
the close of their fiscal years. Bonuses earned in 2007 may
be paid in 2008, thus deferring the recognition of income
by the employee into 2008. The question is whether such payments
are treated as “deferred compensation.”
There
are two deferred compensation issues. The first concerns timing
bonus payments for them to be tax deductible on the return
of the employer on account of which the bonuses are paid.
The second concerns the application of IRC section 409A. For
achieving the deduction, Temp. Reg. section 1.404(b)-1T provides
that compensation paid during the 2 1/2 month period after
the end of the employer’s taxable year is deductible
in the preceding year because it is not considered deferred
compensation.
The second
issue is the application of IRC section 409A, which imposes
specific restrictions on deferred compensation. If a bonus
arrangement is deemed to be deferred compensation, it may
be subject to IRC section 409A. If the arrangement conforms
with the statute, bonuses are currently includible in gross
income subject to an additional 20 percent tax, plus a cumulative
interest charge at the underpayment of the tax rate plus one
percentage point.
IRC section
409A does not apply to deferred compensation that satisfies
its so-called short-term deferral rule. Therefore, if a bonus
program satisfies this rule, it is not considered deferred
compensation and is exempt from IRC section 409A.
To qualify
for the exemption, the bonus payment must be required to be
made (under the terms of a written document) on or before
the 15th day of the third month (i.e., March 15 for a calendar
year taxpayer) following the year-end of the year in which
the bonus was earned. If the client has adopted a written
document reciting the short-term deferral rule, the payments
will not be subject to IRC section 409A, as long as it is
paid by the end of the year.
Q:
Does an S corporation shareholder need wages for retirement
plan purposes?
A: A shareholder-employee in a subchapter S corporation
must receive taxable wages to be eligible to have a contribution
made on his or her behalf to the S corporation’s tax-favored
retirement plan. In an S corporation, “pass-thru”
income is never considered compensation for qualified plan
contribution purposes. Similarly, a partner in a partnership
may only use net-earnings from self-employment as the starting
point for his or her retirement plan contribution. Thus, in
a partnership where capital is a material income-producing
factor, a portion of the partner’s share of ordinary
income may not be earned income eligible for retirement plan
contributions.
Top
of Page
Exempt
Organizations Committee
Q:
Are contributions to tax-exempt organizations that do not
have an IRS Determination Letter tax deductible?
A: Some organizations are not required to file Form
1023, Application for Recognition of Exemption. These include
churches and other religious organizations, as well as any
organization (other than a private foundation) normally having
annual gross receipts of not more than $5,000. These organizations
are exempt automatically if they meet the requirements of
section 501(c)(3).
Therefore,
a donation to a church or an organization with less than $5,000
in annual gross receipts is deductible by the donor as a charitable
contribution whether or not the organization has applied for
and received tax-exempt status from the IRS.
Additional
information and exceptions to this requirement can be obtained
from IRS Publication 557 at http://www.irs.gov/publications/p557/ch03.html#d0e3309.
Q:
What is the difference between a public charity and a private
foundation?
A: All 501(c)(3) organizations have what is called
a “foundation classification.” The terms “public
charity” and “private foundation” are ways
of referring to an organization’s foundation classification.
Because of the way the law is written, any organization that
qualifies for tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3) is
presumed to be a private foundation, unless it can show that
it qualifies for one of the exceptions to private foundation
status. Any organization qualifying for such an exception
is sometimes called a public charity. Some types of organizations,
such as churches and schools, are defined as public charities
by law. But most organizations qualifying for public charity
status do so because they can show that their financial support
comes from a broad cross-section of the public. Organizations
that receive their support from a very narrow base, or that
were set up by a wealthy individual or family, will typically
be classified as private foundations.
Although
both types of organizations are tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3),
private foundations are subject to certain excise taxes and
reporting requirements that do not apply to public charities.
Additional
information and exceptions to this requirement can be obtained
from IRS Publication 557 at http://www.irs.gov/publications/p557/ch03.html#d0e4612.
Q.
When and what types of small or inactive tax-exempt organizations
are required to file the e-postcard?
A: Beginning in 2008, small tax-exempt organizations
that previously were not required to file returns may be required
to file an annual electronic notice, Form 990-N, Electronic
Notice (e-postcard) for Tax-Exempt Organizations Not Required
To File Form 990 or 990-EZ. This filing requirement applies
to tax periods beginning after December 31, 2006. Organizations
that do not file the notice will lose their tax-exempt status.
Small
tax-exempt organizations whose gross receipts are normally
$25,000 or less are not required to file Form 990, Return
of Organization Exempt From Income Tax, or Form 990-EZ, Short
Form Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax. With the
Enactment of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA). These
small tax-exempt organizations will now be required to file
electronically Form 990-N, also known as the e-postcard, with
the IRS annually.
The PPA
requires the IRS to revoke the tax-exempt status of any organization
that fails to meet its annual filing requirement for three
consecutive years. Therefore, organizations that do not file
the e-Postcard (Form 990-N), or an information return Form
990 or 990-EZ for three consecutive years, will have their
tax-exempt status revoked as of the filing due date of the
third year.
Additional
information and exceptions to this requirement can be obtained
from the IRS at http://www.irs.gov/charities/article/0,,id=169250,00.html.
Q: Our organization received exemption under 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code as a public charity. The IRS
issued an advance ruling with respect to our public charity
status (i.e., determined that the organization is not a private
foundation). The IRS Determination Letter states that the
organization is required to file Form 8734 within 90 days
after the end of our advance ruling period. Our advance ruling
period ends June 30, 2009. Is
there any change in connection with the advance ruling process?
Is our organization required to file IRS Form 8734, Support
Schedule for Advance Ruling Period?
A:
New regulations eliminate the advance ruling process under
which a section 501(c)(3) organization was required to file
Form 8734 to establish that it had been a publicly supported
charity during its first five tax years. The new rules apply
to organizations with advance rulings expiring on or after
June 9, 2008.
On Sept.
9, 2008, the IRS issued temporary income tax regulations that
eliminate the advance ruling process for a section 501(c)(3)
organization. Under the new regulations, a new 501(c)(3) organization
will be classified as a publicly supported charity--not a
private foundation-- if it can show that it reasonably can
be expected to be publicly supported when it applies for tax-exempt
status.
A new
Section 501(c)(3) organization that demonstrates a reasonable
likelihood of public support in its application for exempt
status will be recognized as a public charity without any
follow-up requirements [Temp. Reg. 1.170A-9T(f)(5)].
Prior to the adoption of this regulation, a new charitable
organization that anticipated being a public charity because
of its support could only get an advance ruling granting public
charity status for the organization's initial five-year period.
At the end of this period, the organization was required to
file Form 8734 to confirm the sources of its support and get
a final determination letter.
The new rules no longer require the organization to file Form
8734 after completing its first five tax years.
The organization retains its public charity status for its
first five years regardless of the public support actually
received during that time. Beginning with the organization's
sixth taxable year, it must establish that it meets the public
support test by showing that it is publicly supported on its
Schedule A to Form 990 (The IRS has included additional information
on the revised Form 990, Schedule A, to enable organizations
and the IRS to determine if the organization satisfies the
support test.). Organizations that are currently deemed public
charities under an advance ruling letter can now treat the
ruling as their final determination letter [Temp. Reg. 1.170A-9T(f)(14)].
The new rules apply to organizations with advance rulings
expiring on or after June 9, 2008, and those with applications
pending before the IRS, regardless of when Form 1023 was filed.
The IRS
previously notified organizations of the need to file by sending
a notice and enclosing a copy of Form 8734. With the elimination
of the advance ruling period, this notice has been revised
and is being used to notify organizations of the new rules;
however, Form 8734 was enclosed inadvertently with the revised
notice that was mailed to some organizations. An organization
that received such a form should not file it unless its advance
ruling period expired before June 9, 2008.
IRS guidance
can be accessed on the IRS
Web site.
Top
of Page