| |
|
|
| September,
2003 |
The
Monthly Newspaper of the NYSSCPA |
Vol.
8, No. 9 |
GAO
Releases Sarbanes–Oxley Study Results
Board
Takes First Step Toward New Standards
Continued
from the Home
Page
The legislation
specifically asked that the GAO study: factors contributing to firm
mergers; the implications of consolidation on competition and client
choice, audit fees, audit quality and auditor independence; the impact
of consolidation on capital formation and securities markets; and barriers
to entry by smaller accounting firms in competing with the largest for
large public company audits.
Here are highlights
of the results:
-
Domestically and globally, there are only a few large firms capable
of auditing large public companies, which raises potential choice,
price, quality and concentration risk concerns.
-
Although
the GAO found no evidence of impaired competition to date, the significant
changes that have occurred in the profession may have implications
for competition and public company choice, especially in certain industries
in the future.
-
Existing
research on audit fees did not conclusively identify a direct correlation
with consolidation. The GAO found that fees have started to increase,
and most experts expect the trend to continue as the audit environment
responds to recent and ongoing changes in the audit market.
-
Research
on quality and independence did not link audit quality and auditor
independence to consolidation and was generally inconclusive.
-
The
GAO was unable to draw clear linkages between consolidation and capital
formation but did observe potential impacts for some smaller companies
seeking to raise capital. However, given the unprecedented changes
occurring in the audit market, the GAO observes that past behavior
may not be indicative of future behavior, and the potential implications
may warrant additional study in the future, including preventing further
consolidation and maintaining competition.
-
Finally,
the GAO found that smaller accounting firms faced significant barriers
to entry into the large public company audit market, including lack
of staff, industry and technical expertise, capital formation, global
reach, and reputation. As a result, market forces are not likely to
result in the expansion of the current Big Four accounting firms.
Certain factors could cause a further reduction in the number of major
accounting firms.
|