August 2001
Industry Profile
Q: How long have you worked
for Loews Corporation?
A: Twenty-four years.
Q: What industry is
your company most closely associated with?
A: We like to say we are closely
associated with the finance industry because we own five businesses. We own an
insurance company, a tobacco company, an oil-drilling company, a watch company—Bulova—and
a hotel business too—Loews Hotels.
Q: What are your primary functions and
responsibilities?
A: Internal auditing.
Q:What are the biggest
differences between the work you perform and the work performed by CPAs who belong
to other industries or public practices?
A: What I would see as the big
difference is that you need to be knowledgeable in all those businesses. There’s
a lot of studying to keep up in all those businesses. I read a lot of trade publications
and talk to a lot of operations people throughout the company.
Q: What
are the similarities?
A: The only real similarity is knowing how to do
an audit and the process. But what you audit is different. In the case of a public
accountant’s audit, you do work with general ledger accounts and financial reporting,
preparation or review of an annual report. In an operations audit, you’re involved
with internal controls. You’re also involved in enhancing revenues and decreasing
costs. In public accounting, you’re looking for accuracy in financial reporting,
internally, you’re looking to safeguard assets and save money.
Q: With
respect to your industry and the accounting work you conduct there, what are the
most significant developments to take place over the last five years?
A:
The most significant development has been in technology. It has been greater than
anyone could have predicted. Five years ago, it was unheard of to drill for oil
in three or four thousand feet of water. Now, we can drill in 10,000 feet of water.
That’s all due to technology. Digital technology has obviously improved communication;
I don’t think we’re alone in this issue. Everyone has to be on the technology
bandwagon, even a candystore owner.
Q: Do you consider these developments
to be reflective of broader developments that have occurred in the accounting
profession?
A: I think it’s the other way around. It’s these developments
that created development in the profession. New drilling technology provided a
need to account for cost, financial planning, and other changes to control the
costs of these new technologies. That affects the accounting profession. Also,
a lot of the technological developments in computers and telecommunications have
helped simplify the accounting profession’s work. For companies like us, there
are enterprise resource planning programs, which are huge pieces of software used
to create and manipulate large databases in such a way that they can provide internal
management with information to make better decisions.
Q: What are some
of the current trends in your line of work? To what do you attribute them?
A:
I guess the major new trend is the use of analytics to audit, as opposed to detailed
testing. Using computers to compare similar items from month to month and year
to year, as well as techniques like regression and correlation analysis, which
are relatively new.
Q: Are these trends confined to your industry alone?
A: Some of those techniques might be applied to investment analysts, but
I can’t answer that, in all honesty.
Q: For the long term, what are some
of your biggest challenges?
A: The biggest challenge is always keeping
ahead of the curve in knowing about what new technologies are available, what’s
going on in our industries that might be available to management. To stay ahead
of the curve and to understand what your competition is doing.
Q: Do you
expect accountants outside your industry to face similar sorts of challenges?
A: Without a doubt. Everybody is going to be facing those sorts of challenges.
Q: With respect to the entire accounting profession, what are the advantages
of working in your industry? Conversely, what are the disadvantages?
A:
In my case they are the same. I’m exposed to a whole broad array of businesses,
which is a pleasant challenge, but the base of knowledge is so much broader you
can’t know it all. It’s something you just work at on a continuing basis.
Q: Why is the work you perform important to accountants outside your industry?
A: I don’t think it is important to anyone except internally. I don’t
expect my work will make a major impact on the world to the extent that anyone
will build a statue of me in Central Park.
Q: How do the major issues currently
surrounding the entire accounting profession affect your work? If they don’t affect
you right now, will they in the future?
A: The XYZ is probably the most
important development because our company is global. For me to identify with and
be able to relate to people globally will be the greatest advancement in our profession
in the last 100 years. Just think about sharing a credential with extremely knowledgeable
business people who have passed a credentialing test and operate within ethical
metes and bounds. Most of those who will get the credential are already employed
in the accounting profession as consultants, attorneys, financial planners, and
business valuation specialists. The negative issue I see affecting the profession
is the standards overload problem and the lack of a relevant accounting model.
The current accounting model is a dinosaur that should have been made extinct
20 years ago. The profession has been unrealistic about revising the accounting
model. The current system, where we report on events as much as 16 months after
they occur, is too archaic and totally irrelevant. Today, people want to know
what’s happening tomorrow. Also, no one wants to read numerous pages of footnotes
that don’t make sense.
Q: Do you believe public practice accountants have
an accurate understanding of the work you perform? If not, why?
A: I think
some of them do. I would be lying to you if I said I knew everything about taxes,
but there are a whole bunch of accountants who are experts in taxes. Most people
in the tax and financial planning regimen don’t have a clue what I do. But people
on the auditing side have a good idea of what I do, including those in our outside
auditing firm. We complement each other in our daily lives, so it’s a mixed bag
in terms of our understanding.
Q: Do you believe the Society adequately
represents your interests? If not, what could be done to make sure you receive
fair representation?
A: No, I don’t. They never have and they probably
never will, but there’s a good reason for that. The reason I see for it is that
the Society and the AICPA need to support the efforts of public practitioners
because those organizations are the only places where the public practitioners’
professsional interests can be represented. My interests can be represented by
many other organizations, and the interests of my company can be represented by
an array of associations. However, I do strongly support the activities of accounting
societies.
Q: Overall, have you enjoyed working for an industry? Why or
why not?
A: Overwhelmingly yes. I’ve been uniquely challenged; I do a
lot of things relating to getting involved in business decisions important to
me as an individual and my company, with an opportunity to express myself with
more than just numbers.
Richard E. Piluso is vice president of internal
audit of New York City–based Loews Corporation. Piluso began his career as a CPA
in 1968 at Haskins & Sells, which later became part of Deloitte & Touche.