July 2001
Putting ASPs to
Work in CPA Practices
CPAs and Vendors Discuss the Pros and
Cons By Carrie
Crockett
Security and manageability concerns, coupled with the
ever-increasing pace of technological change, are causing companies to hire application
service providers to centralize computer processing. The ASP updates the company’s
hardware and software, manages its computer system, and trains its users.
Held in April, the New York State Society of CPAs’ Business and Technology Conference
featured a continuing professional education session on the application and viability
of ASPs in accounting practices. Speakers included Robert Scott, editor of Accounting
Technology; Jodi Maxson, vice president of business development for NetLedger;
and David Thomas, CEO of Intacct.
ASPs help firms simplify their computer
operations with minimal up-front cost and no administrative cost. Firms that hire
ASPs need not be concerned about the version of software being used. According
to Scott, firms and their clients can share files seamlessly and, because the
data is on the Internet, have access to their files 24 hours a day, seven days
a week.
However, while there are clear advantages to ASPs, there are many
issues to consider before using them or recommending them to clients. According
to both Maxson and Thomas, the two most significant concerns of ASPs are viability
and security. The two speakers said that, as the service is relatively new, their
clients have expressed concern over relying too heavily on ASPs. Consequently,
firms are wary of entrusting too much of their day-to-day operations to an ASP
that could shut down with little advance warning.
In fact, several audience
members spoke of the difficulties they currently face trying to assure clients
that putting data on the Internet is safe.
“I have a client who won’t fax
information to me,” Sharon Clements of Grassi & Co. CPAs PC said. “He’s convinced
someone can extract the information through the fax line. I have clients who need
this kind of support, but until the end users get the initial idea planted in
their heads, I can’t use [ASPs].”
Because ASPs lack thorough testing—having
been on the market for only a short time—performance is another concern, Thomas
said.
While discussing the pros and cons of ASPs, Thomas also spoke of some
of the disadvantages of using traditional computer processing systems for accounting.
The time and cost involved in in-house computing can be significant. Firms using
ASPs can spend more time focusing on accounting and less time worrying about the
complexities of their computing system, he said.
Still more problems include
the multiple applications and locations of traditional accounting that make integration
difficult. And scalability (e.g., moving from one system to another) can be difficult
to achieve through traditional accounting computing methods, Thomas said.
Scott said CPAs should invest the same amount of time and thought to selecting
an ASP as they would to any other aspect of the practice. Besides NetLedger and
Intacct, there are many other ASP players on the field; Peachtree, Intuit, MS
Finance Manager, and e-Ledger are just some of the other vendors.
Scott reminded
the audience that, no matter which vendor is chosen, ASPs are a relatively new
service and growing pains should be expected.