|
Unreported
Offshore Accounts? New Yorkers Can Avoid State Tax
Penalties Through Voluntary Disclosure
By
William Comiskey, JD
For
New York taxpayers with unreported income in hidden offshore
accounts, now is the time to
come forward and
disclose that income to both federal authorities under
the IRS offshore voluntary disclosure initiative, and to
state and local tax authorities under New York’s
Voluntary
Disclosure and Compliance Program. Because the
stakes are so high, practitioners should do their best
to persuade any clients in this situation to participate
to reduce federal penalties and avoid all state penalties.
The Time Is Now
The IRS is currently administering a widely publicized
federal
offshore voluntary disclosure initiative offering
reduced federal penalties for taxpayers who failed to report
non-U.S. financial accounts and assets on an FBAR
(Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) and who failed
to report income from those accounts and assets on their
federal income tax returns. That initiative is the second
such program offered by the IRS to encourage taxpayers
to voluntarily disclose the existence of any hidden offshore
accounts. The first program ended on Oct. 15, 2009, and
the current program will end on Aug. 31, 2011.
Taxpayers
and practitioners who are considering participating in the
federal program—or those who participated in the earlier
federal initiative—who have New York tax liabilities
would be well-advised to also apply to the New York program.
For eligible taxpayers, participating in the New York program
is an easy and safe way to avoid all state penalties, including
criminal sanctions, for delinquent tax liabilities disclosed
through the program.
Offshore Accounts: Riskier Than Ever
Disclosure under the federal and state
programs makes sense because, for taxpayers with tax
liabilities arising
from unreported income in offshore accounts, the risks
have never been greater. Indeed, the so-called “safe
haven” that some found in offshore financial institutions
is rapidly disappearing under the relentless pressure of
the IRS to break through the wall of foreign secrecy rules.
That effort continues unabated, and any
individual with unreported offshore income is “playing with fire,” according
to John DiCicco, acting assistant attorney general of the
United States Department of Justice Tax Division, as reported
in Tax Notes Today on Feb. 28, 2011 in a piece by R. Jackson
and J. Coder entitled, “Government to use TIEA Network
to Fight Offshore Tax Evasion.”
Indeed, by way of example, on April 7,
the IRS successfully secured judicial authorization under
IRC
Section 7602 to
issue a John Doe summons on HSBC Bank USA, through which
the agency will be able to obtain information identifying
potentially thousands of U.S. taxpayers with substantial
unreported accounts in HSBC’s India arm, the Hong
Kong and Shanghai Banking Corp., Ltd.
In addition to ramped-up IRS investigative efforts, taxpayers
with hidden offshore accounts also have to contend with
the new, and unquestionably real, danger presented by banking
insiders who are threatening to publicly expose foreign
account holders by posting account information on whistleblower
website Wikileaks.
A similar,
and potentially greater, threat to those with offshore accounts
is presented by the recent increase in government tax whistleblower
programs. Both the IRS (through its whistleblower
program) and now New York (through the False
Claims Act, codified in Article 13 of the State Finance
Law, Sections 187 to 194, are offering potentially huge
awards to those who blow the whistle on tax cheats. Some
whistleblower law firms even specifically target offshore
account cases in an active search for viable whistleblower
cases.
The Stakes are High in N.Y.
The IRS is not the only agency to increase its efforts
to target tax fraud. In recent years, the New York State
Department of Taxation and Finance greatly increased its
commitment to tax enforcement. The department has also
been proactive and aggressive in targeting and pursuing
tax evaders.
The
numbers, which demonstrate the huge jump in state tax criminal
enforcement, tell the story. The following statistics, which
relate to cases of income and sales and corporate tax fraud,
were presented to the State District Attorneys Association
in July 2010:
|
Enforcement
|
Fiscal
2006–2007
|
Fiscal
2009
|
| Civil
audits and other matters referred by the department’s
civil Audit Division and the Collections and Civil Enforcement
Division to the department’s Criminal Division
for possible investigation |
98 |
994 |
| Criminal
tax fraud investigations opened by the department’s
Criminal Division |
581 |
2,212 |
| Criminal
tax fraud referrals by the department to state and local
prosecutors |
198 |
625 |
| Criminal
tax fraud prosecutions initiated |
33 |
352 |
In addition
to more aggressive criminal enforcement, new laws enacted
in the last several years gave department staff and prosecutors
stronger tools to punish tax fraud. For example, in 2009,
Article 37 of the tax law was amended to greatly increase
the criminal sanctions for state tax evasion. The new provisions
created a new crime—tax fraud—and adopted a
classification system for felony offenses that markedly
increased the severity and punishment for acts of serious
tax evasion.
Under the old law, regardless of the amount
of tax evaded, the vast majority of tax offenses were
only punishable
as misdemeanors or as low-level felonies. Under the new
law, both the level of crime and the severity of the possible
sentence hinge on the amount of tax evaded. At the top
end of the new classification system, those convicted of
evading more than $1 million in tax face a possible sentence
of up to 25 years in state prison—a huge jump from
the prior cap of four years which was only applicable in
a limited number of instances.
In addition, as part of the same 2009 compliance package
that increased criminal penalties, the state also increased
the administrative fraud penalty that can be imposed in
a department audit to a whopping 200 percent of the tax
evaded. For example, see Section 685(e)(1) regarding income
tax deficiencies and Section 1145(2) regarding sales tax
deficiencies.
The
drive for stronger state tax enforcement laws continued
into 2010. In August, the New York State Legislature unanimously
adopted a new tax whistleblower statute under the False
Claims Act, found in New York State Finance Law Article
13, which imposes a 300 percent penalty on taxpayers who
knowingly violate the tax law in cases of significant tax
evasion. Under the new law, whistleblowers can earn rewards
of up to 30 percent of the amount recovered from the tax
evader.
Armed with these new enforcement tools,
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman recently
created a new unit in
his office—the Taxpayer
Protection Bureau—to
investigate cases of fraud against the state, including
tax fraud and whistleblower cases, and he has repeatedly
vowed to aggressively use the False Claims Act to pursue
such cases.
Given these federal and state governmental
enforcement initiatives, it is not surprising that thousands
of individuals
with offshore accounts have already come forward under
the federal disclosure program and that nearly a thousand—who
have already paid New York state roughly $52 million in
delinquent taxes—have come forward under New York’s
program.
These taxpayers apparently recognized, correctly in my
opinion, that it was better to self-disclose their offshore
liabilities than to face the increasing risks presented
by this array of strengthened, energized and committed
tax enforcement agencies.
Easy Access to the N.Y. Program
The
good news is that the voluntary disclosure program in New
York is a simple and easy program.
Taxpayers
apply online and are accepted into the program if they sign
a compliance agreement; file amended, or new, returns; pay
the tax due; and meet the statutory eligibility requirements.
Almost all taxpayers are eligible. Only
those who are already under audit or investigation by
the department
for the tax liability being disclosed; who are under criminal
investigation by a state or local law enforcement agency;
who have already been billed for the liability being disclosed;
or who are disclosing a liability based on an investment
in a tax shelter—a federal or New York state listed
or reportable transaction—are ineligible.
While the department has the right to review
the taxpayer’s
submission and to ask for additional information from the
taxpayer, the department generally does not conduct an
investigation of the submission prior to accepting the
taxpayer into the program. The department may, however,
audit any return filed as part of the taxpayer’s
application.
The protections provided by the state program are more
generous than those offered under the federal program.
For eligible taxpayers, timely disclosure to the New York
program will provide complete protection from all state
and local tax penalties, including criminal prosecution.
In contrast, participants in the federal initiative are
still required to pay penalties, albeit at a reduced, but
still substantial, rate.
In addition, while disclosure under the federal initiative
will generally result in protection from criminal prosecution,
the state program provides a statutory guarantee that participants
who comply with their compliance agreement will not be
prosecuted.
The look-back provisions of the state program are also
more generous. Taxpayers disclosing liabilities based on
an unreported offshore account have been allowed to use
a six year look-back period in the state program. By way
of contrast, the IRS program has an eight year look-back
period.
More information on the federal voluntary disclosure initiative
can be found on the IRS website.
Timing Is Everything
Disclosures must be timely. If the state
learns of a taxpayer’s
offshore account—whether through a whistleblower
disclosure, an independent investigation or from the IRS—and
opens an audit or investigation before the taxpayer makes
his or her state disclosure, then all bets are off and
that taxpayer can expect the state to aggressively seek
some or all of the enhanced penalties described above including,
in certain cases, criminal sanctions.
Taxpayers who want to take advantage of
the state’s
generous program should move quickly to make their state
and local disclosures. Taxpayers do not need to wait until
completion of the federal disclosure program process. Indeed,
the longer taxpayers wait, the greater the risk they will
lose the opportunity to disclose and to receive the benefits
of the state program because of a state-initiated audit
or investigation.
And
that is not a position that any taxpayer will want to face.
Click
here for more Tax Stringer coverage by Mr.
Comiskey concerning New York’s statutory voluntary
disclosure program and New York’s new tax whistleblower
program under the False Claims Act.
William
Comiskey, JD, is a partner with Hodgson Russ LLP
working in the firm's Albany and New York offices. Prior to
joining Hodgson Russ, he held top-level government positions
with New York state agencies responsible for tax enforcement
and for investigating and prosecuting health care fraud, physician
misconduct, complex financial fraud, and official misconduct.
His prior roles include: deputy commissioner for tax enforcement
at the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance;
deputy attorney general in charge of New York's Medicaid Fraud
Control Unit; and director of the Bureau of Professional Medical
Conduct in New York's Department of Health. He also served
as chief assistant district attorney in Rensselaer County
and as assistant district attorney in the Manhattan district
attorney's office. He began his legal career at the New York
Court of Appeals, where he clerked for Associate Judge Hugh
R. Jones. Mr. Comiskey can be reached at WComiske@hodgsonruss.com.
|