|
Section I: About Peer Review (PR)
Section
II: PR Standards, Effective 1-1-09
Section III: Guidance on PR Standards
Section IV: Government Auditing Standards
Section
V: SQCS No. 7
Section
VI: About Peer Reviewers
Section
VII: Recent Professional Standards Developments
Section
VIII: Pre-2009 Peer Review Guidance
Section
IX: AICPA Oversight of NYSSCPA PR Program Administration
Section
X: Conferences, Seminars and Peer Review Training Materials
Section
XI: Facilitated State Board Access
Section I: About Peer Review
This section
provides an overview of peer review and is also designed to assist
inexperienced reviewers
and firms who
are considering initiating a peer review practice in evaluating
the benefits and costs and requirements of this specialized
practice segment. Additionally, it provides experienced
reviewers with marketing materials and ideas to expand
their existing peer review practice.
A. Practice
Management Tool Kits for Peer Reviewers
B. Practitioners Tool Kit for Peer Reviewers
C. Peer
Review Questions & Answers Booklet
D. Reviewers
Who Perform Reviews in Accordance With the AICPA’s
PRP
E. Why Become a Peer Reviewer
F. How to Become a Peer Reviewer
G. Enrollment Form
H. Peer
Review: An Emerging Niche Market (The CPA Journal,
July 2008)
I. Introducing
the New Principles-Based Peer Review Standards (The
Journal of Accountancy, May 2009)
J. 2009 Oversight Report
Section II:
Peer Review Standards Effective January 1, 2009 and Related Information
The
links contained in this section contain materials which
reviewers utilize in the conduct of peer reviews commencing
on or after January 1, 2009. The last three subsections
beginning with the link to the “White Paper” (subsection
K) should be consulted if reviewers need clarification
or background information on the 2009 revisions.
A. AICPA Peer
Review Manual, effective for reviews commencing
on or after January 1, 2009
B. 2009 Team Captain Packages
C. System Review Team Captain Materials
D. Engagement/Report Review Reviewer Package
E. 10 Steps to Performing an Efficient Review of an Audit
Engagement
F. 2009 Peer Reviews: Update No. 9 January 2009- Peer
Review Questions and Answers
G. PRP Section 4950: Instructions for Use of Matter for
Further Consideration (MFC) Forms for System Reviews
H. PRP Section 4960: Instructions for Use of Findings
for Further Consideration (FFC) Forms for System Reviews
I. PRP Section 6500: Instructions for Use of Matter for
Further Consideration (MFC) Forms for Engagement Reviews
J. PRP Section 6600: Instructions for Use of Findings
for Further Consideration (FFC) Forms for Engagement
Reviews
K. White
Paper—Navigating Through the Revised Standards
L. Transition Guidance on CPE for New Peer Review Standards
Effective January 1, 2009
M. Revised Standards for Performing and Reporting on
Peer Reviews
Section
III: Peer Review Standards: Guidance and related
matters
This section includes guidance in addition to that
provided by peer review interpretations and the Standards themselves,
and forms part of the body of the AICPA’s peer review
technical rules.
A. Peer
Reviewers' Alert
B. Peer
Review Alert – April 2009
C. Peer Review Alert- June 2009
Section IV: Government Auditing Standards
A. A-133 Update
Section
V: Statement on Quality Control Standard No. 7
SQCS No. 7 supersedes SQCS’s No’s 2-6 (SQCS
No. 2 superseded SQCS No. 1) and, accordingly, is the source
of guidance from the Auditing Standards Board of the AICPA
for an accounting firm’s responsibilities for a system
of quality control, for its accounting and auditing practice,
and also provides the meaning of certain terms used in SQCS’ in
describing the professional requirements for firms and engagement
partners. SQCS No. 7 should be read in conjunction with the
Code of Professional Conduct.
A. Statement
on Quality Control Standards No. 7, A Firm’s
System of Quality Control
Section
VI: Information about Peer Reviewers
A. Looking
for a Reviewer? Search here.
B. Change in Experience Codes on Reviewer Resumes
C. Search for a Firm Enrolled in the AICPA Practice Monitoring
Program (PRP)
Section
VII: Recent Professional Standards Developments
This section contains links providing easy and
quick access to articles discussing certain recent developments
in professional
standards (with an emphasis on Statements on Auditing Standards)
which continue to receive attention in the financial press and
professional news. Peer reviewers and reviewed firms can utilize
this section for critical, analytical, and interpretive support
during discussions and evaluation of matters arising during the
review, such as the nature and extent of planning stage audit procedures
(e.g., SAS 99, 104-111 articles), audit documentation standards
(e.g., SAS 103 articles) and communication matters (e.g., SAS’s
112 and 114 articles). If you are interested in recently issued
rulemaking exposure drafts from the Auditing Standards Board (ASB),
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), and the Government
Accountability Office (GAO), please visit the Exposure
Drafts section
under Professional Resources of the NYSSCPA website.
*Note: This section is not intended to and should not be relied upon
as a substitute for the SAS’s or other
original authoritative literature issued by rule making bodies
covered in the articles
and other materials.
A. FASB Votes
to Delay Effective Date of FIN 48 for Nonpublic Entities (November
2007)
B. SAS 112 Guidance
C. Conference Call on SAS 112
D. SAS 112
E. SAS
112 Toolkit
F. Understanding SAS No. 112
G. SAS Nos. 104-111 Toolkit
H. SAS
104-111 (Adobe Acrobat required)
I. AICPA Powerpoint on SAS 104-111
J. Revisions to Interpretation 101-3 Performance of Nonattest
Services
K. FASB Interpretation 48
L. FASB Interpretation 48 (AICPA)
M. Practice Guide on Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions
Under FIN 48
N. FAQ About FIN 48
O. FIN 48 From Different Perspectives
P. To Consolidate or Not: For Some Companies, That IS the
Question (The Journal of Accountancy, December 2005)
Q. Consolidation
of Variable-Interest Entities: Applying the Provisions of FIN
46(R) (The CPA Journal, August 2006)
R. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Proposes New
Auditing Standard: Engagement Quality Review
S. Yellow
Book: The Gold Standard: Working Toward Better Government Audits
in New York State (The CPA Journal,
May 2008)
T. The
Challenges of Transparency in Corporate Tax Departments: What
Will the New Audit Documentation Requirements and FIN 48
Reveal to the IRS? (The CPA Journal, October 2007)
U. Implementing
the New ASB Risk Assessment Audit Standards (The CPA Journal, June 2007)
V. Auditors’ Responsibilities Formalized Under
SAS 109: Understanding Risks Associated with the Legal and Regulatory
Environment (The CPA Journal, February 2007)
W. Technology
Changes the Form and Competence of Audit Evidence (The CPA Journal, January
2007)
X. CPAs’ Perceptions of the Impact of SAS 99 (The CPA
Journal, June 2005)
Y. Introducing
the New Principles-Based Peer Review Standards (The
Journal of Accountancy, May 2009)
Section
VIII: Pre-2009 Peer Reviews: Forms, Guidance, and other matters
A. 2008
Team Captain Packages
B. 2007
PEER REVIEW Engagement Checklists and Practice Aids
C. Uncertainties
Created by FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (The
CPA Journal, April 2007)
D. Q&A
on the GAO's New Independence Standard
E. Leading
the Way in Peer Review
Section
IX: AICPA Oversight of the NYSSCPA Administration of the Peer
Review Program Introduction
The AICPA Peer
Review Board (board) is the senior committee governing the AICPA
Peer Review Program (program). This includes
overseeing and coordinating the activities of state CPA societies
(hereinafter, administering entity) approved by the board
to administer peer reviews.
The main objectives
of the board oversight program are to provide reasonable assurance
that: (1)
the participating administering entities are complying with
the administrative procedures
established by the board as set forth in the AICPA Peer
Review Program Administrative Manual;
(2) reviews are being conducted and reported upon in accordance
with the standards; (3) results
of reviews are being evaluated on a consistent basis in
all jurisdictions; (4) and information
provided to firms and reviewers (via the Internet or other
media) by administering entities is
accurate and timely.
A. AICPA
Report on 2008 Oversight of NYSSCPA
B. NYSSCPA
Letter of Response to 2008 AICPA Oversight Report
C. AICPA
Oversight Acceptance Letter of NYSSCPA
Section
X: Conferences, Seminars and Peer Review Training Materials
A. AICPA 2009 Peer Review Conference
Section
XI: Facilitated State Board Access
AICPA Launches
Facilitated State Board Access Program
New York State
Society of CPAs is participating in the AICPA Peer
Review Facilitated State Board Access (FSBA). What is Facilitated State Board Access?
This new AICPA program uses the existing peer review process to
facilitate the voluntary disclosure of peer review results to
state boards of accountancy (BOAs).
How Will Facilitated State Board Access Benefit My Firm?
The
goal of this new process is to create a nationally uniform system
through which CPA firms can satisfy state board peer review
information submission requirements, increase transparency, and
retain control over their peer review results. In New York, the
new accountancy law that was passed in 2009 will make peer review
(quality review) mandatory. However, since that part of the law
in not effective until 2012, the New York peer review administrators
will focus on the part of the process that will allow submission
of peer review results to other BOAs as specifically requested
by the firm. This new process is expected to help make submission
of your firm’s peer review information to other BOAs easier.
The process and any other requirements under the New York law
will be evaluated as 2012 approaches.
What
This Means for Your Firm
This new process uses
the existing peer review process to facilitate the voluntary
disclosure of peer review results to BOAs. Firms
to which the process will be applicable will receive a notice of
these changes once participation begins for New York firms on or
after the July 20, 2009 RAB meeting. When Will
Facilitated State Board Access Be Implemented?
Six states
participated in the pilot from October 2007 to March
2008. Another 10 states participated in early adoption from
May 2008 to December 2008. Full national implementation
will occur
throughout 2009 in connection with the acceptance of new
peer review reports issued under the revised AICPA Standards
for
Performing
and Reporting on Peer Reviews.
How Will
This New Process Work?
FSBA uses
an opt-in process that allows peer review results to be made
available to select
BOAs on a voluntary firm basis,
using
a secure BOA web site available only to authorized state board
representatives. Beginning with reviews accepted on or after
the July 20, 2009 RAB meeting, firms with their main office
located
in New York will receive an additional letter with their firm’s
peer review acceptance letter informing them that they can request
the New York State Society of CPAs to post their peer review
results to a secure BOA web site with access given to select
BOAs that
require peer review and are not prohibited from accessing the
results. For firms whose main office is located in New York,
the peer review
AE is the New York State Society of CPAs. Firms that are not
members of the AICPA Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center
(EBPAQC),
Governmental Audit Quality Center (GAQC) or Private Companies
Practice Section (PCPS) will also be given the opportunity to
select additional
BOAs for expanded access. Below are the details of how the new
process will work. In New York, the process will entail:
-
Receiving an additional letter with your firm’s peer review
acceptance letter informing you that you can request the New York
State Society of CPAs to post your firm’s peer review results
to a secure BOA web site with access given to specific BOAs that
require peer review and are permitted access to peer review information.
- To
have your peer review results posted for access by other
BOAs, you must return the communication to
the New York State
Society of CPAs with specific instructions. You can request that
your results be made available to more than one BOA, as long
as the BOAs require peer review and are not prohibited
from obtaining
access to peer review information. Access will be limited
only to those BOAs that are participating. It is anticipated that
this option will be beneficial to firms, over time, with
multi-state
practices.
Firms
will be notified by the New York State Society of CPAs
when the BOA(s) that they have selected for expanded
access are participating
in FSBA. This notification will remind firms of their selection
and provide them with the opportunity to change their decision
regarding expanded access.
What
Documents Will Be Posted Under This Process?
For firms
that choose to provide access to one or more eligible
BOAs, the following documents will be posted,
as applicable, to
the secure BOA web site for access only by authorized state
board representatives. The number of documents posted to
the secure
BOA web site for a firm may vary based upon the results
of the peer
review. A firm will not choose which documents will be posted
as each of those that are applicable (based on the
results of the
review) will be posted.
The following
documents will be posted to the secure BOA web site, as
applicable:
- Peer
review report
- Letter
of comments
- Letter
of response
- Acceptance
letter
- Letter(s)
signed by the reviewed firm indicating that the peer
review documents have been accepted with
the
understanding that the reviewed firm agrees to take certain actions
- Letter
notifying the reviewed firm or individual that certain
required actions have been completed
Firms
that choose to expand access to other eligible BOAs may
change their mind even after their information
has
been posted
by notifying
the New York State Society of CPAs in writing. Once the
New York State Society of CPAs has been notified, the
information will
be removed from the web site, however, certain information
(which is currently publicly available) will remain posted
to the secure
BOA web site.
This
information will help us to maintain a
complete database of all firms in the peer review program.
The information
that will be posted even if a firm does not select
BOAs for expanded access is as follows:
-
Firm’s name and address
- Firm’s
enrollment in the Peer Review Program
- The
date of acceptance and the period covered by the firm’s
most recently accepted peer review
- Whether
the firm’s enrollment in the program was
terminated or dropped.
Q&A
on Facilitated State Board Access
Click
here for a list of frequently asked questions regarding
the Facilitated State Board Access.
For Additional
Information or Questions
Please contact the NYSSCPA Peer Review staff at 212-719-8300 or
by visiting the AICPA website at http://www.aicpa.org/Professional+Resources/Peer+Review.
|