![]() |
| Regulating
the Accounting Profession Substitute “accountant” for “CPA,” and the answer will be essentially the same; for the average person, there is no difference between a CPA and an accountant. “Well, don’t you have to be a CPA to be an accountant?” is the response most often heard, using the following analogies: A lawyer can’t practice law without passing a state bar exam, and a medical doctor can’t practice medicine without passing the medical boards. Why, then, are accountants allowed to practice accounting without passing the CPA exam? Regaining Respect The public looks to accountants for various types of financial services: tax preparation and planning, financial planning, business management consulting, financial statement preparation, and attestation services. Yet the only function that differentiates a CPA from any other accountant is that only a CPA can sign off on an audit report for a public company. CPAs have worked hard to earn the level of recognition that other professions, such as medicine and law, have achieved. However, the accounting profession’s luster and prestige, not to mention compensation, still lag considerably behind. According to the 2006 Salary Guide from Robert Half International Inc., entry-level public accountants can expect to earn between $36,750 and $46,000, while the average salary for an entry-level attorney is from $61,500 to $85,750. Physicians’ Search sets the first-year starting salary for a general practice physician at $90,000 to $130,000. In New York, the number of academic credits necessary to qualify for the CPA licensing exam will increase by 30 additional credit hours beyond the traditional baccalaureate degree, effective August 1, 2009. This significantly adds to an accounting student’s educational expenses, not to mention the opportunity cost of another year or two of school. Furthermore, after licensure, CPAs are required to complete 120 continuing professional education (CPE) credit hours every three years. And we wonder why we’re having difficulty attracting the best and the brightest to our profession? A simple cost-benefit analysis provides a clue. If we use the medical profession as a model, an individual must complete postsecondary education (medical school), pass the medical boards, and complete an internship and residency to practice medicine. Subsequently, a doctor who wants to specialize in a particular area of medicine, such as pediatrics or orthopedics, must complete an additional course of study and another residency. The CPA license should be the basic “general practice” requirement for entry into the accounting profession. Areas of specialization could subsequently be recognized as a result of further education or experience, with a relevant testing instrument in a specific field. Advanced proficiency would be validated by additional certifications and designations, such as certified information systems auditor (CISA), certified fraud examiner (CFE), and personal financial specialist (PFS). Standards That Reflect Expectations If we are to raise the stature of the accounting profession, regulation must apply to the entire profession, not just CPAs. Without restrictions and controls, maintaining standards and enforcing those standards is virtually impossible. There are several ways to ensure that the public’s expectations—that all accountants are competent and ethical—are met:
The creation of the PCAOB indicated the public’s willingness to assume the responsibility of regulating the accounting profession if we prove not to be up to the task. The proverbial ball is in our court. I welcome your comments and suggestions on these and other issues.
|