A09953
STATE OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________________
9953
IN ASSEMBLY
March 4, 2002
___________
Introduced by M. of A. BARRA, ALFANO, SPANO -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M.
of A. BROWN, DAVIS, FINCH, MILLER, THIELE -- read once and referred to
the Committee on Governmental Operations
AN ACT in relation to prohibiting the state from employing the services
of the accounting firm Andersen, LLP
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no department,
2 bureau, board, commission, authority or any other agency or instrumen-
3 tality of the state shall contract for, employ or otherwise engage the
4 services of the accounting firm Andersen, LLP. Any department, bureau,
5 board, commission, authority or any other agency or instrumentality of
6 the state that have contracts with Andersen, LLP on the effective date
7 of this act shall review such contract within six months of the effec-
8 tive date of this act to determine if Andersen, LLP is performing its
9 duties pursuant to such contracts.
10 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD14632-01-2
NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(e)
RETRIEVE BILL
 
BILL NUMBER: A9953
SPONSOR: Barra (MS)
 
TITLE OF BILL: An act in relation to prohibiting the state from
employing the services of the accounting firm Andersen, LLP
 
SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no department, bureau, board, commission, authority or any other
agency or instrumentality of the state shall contract for, employ or
otherwise engage the services of the accounting firm Andersen, LLP.
 
PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA: New York should take the lead in protecting
its citizens from the practice of using auditing firms as business
consultants, as in the case of Enron Corporation using the firm of
Andersen, LLP as both auditor and business consultant. This bill could
be the first step in reforming the practice of using accounting firms to
report performance that confirms their own counsel as business consult-
ants.
 
JUSTIFICATION:The bankruptcy of the Enron Corporation brought to the
forefront the questionable practice of the conflicted role of the audit-
ing firms, in this case the firm of Arthur Andersen. It is common prac-
tice for many corporations to retain the services of outside accountants
as business consultants. One would wonder if an independent audit might
have raised early warning signs and prevented the financial catastrophe
that ensued.
 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: NONE
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: NONE
 
EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately