| |
|
Governance
| MINUTES
OF: |
Foundation
for Accounting Education, Inc. Board of Trustees |
| DATE
& TIME: |
Tuesday,
January 29, 2008 at 9:09am |
| PRESIDING
OFFICER: |
Peter
K. Maier, President |
| BOARD
MEMBERS PRESENT: By Teleconference |
Ann
Burstein Cohen, President Elect
Scott J. Jaffee, Secretary
Arthur Bloom
Elliot L. Hendler
Alan Kahn
Don A. Kiamie
D. Edward Martin
James F. Passikoff, Treasurer
|
| TRUSTEES
ABSENT: |
None
|
| STAFF
PRESENT: at NYSSCPA Office – 3 Park Avenue, NYC, NY |
Suvro
C.K. Banerjee
Annette Davis
Derrick Chou
Alan Schmelkin
David M. Schneider
|
| OTHER
PRESENT : by Teleconference |
Kevin
Whorton |
Minutes
| 1)
Call to Order |
President
Maier called the meeting to order at 9:09 am |
| 2)
CPE Survey Results: |
Mr.
Schmelkin opened the teleconference meeting to discuss
the findings of the recently concluded FAE Survey of
CPE/Professional Development Needs for which the Board
of Trustees had approved the use of an outside consultant.
The survey was distributed to all Board members in advance,
so that questions, conclusions and strategic direction
could be discussed. Mr. Schmelkin introduced Kevin Whorton,
Principal of Whorton Marketing & Research, who characterized
the study as a means to measure such factors as: when
CPAs need professional development and education, where
do they turn; how well does FAE satisfy CPAs’
needs in professional development areas with our course
offerings, and finally, how could FAE make changes that
would increase the value CPAs receive. Mr. Whorton discussed
his sampling methodology drawn from NYSSCPA members
and nonmembers with a history of exposure/attendance
at FAE events. An
11% response rate, while relatively low, yielded statistically
significant results. A comparison of the demographic
traits of respondents with overall Society population
tracked proportionally across virtually all criteria.
In response to President Maier asking for an opinion
regarding the response rate Mr. Whorton stated that
single-subject surveys tend to elicit responses from
those who are most concerned with the issue or service
in question. Therefore the results might be considered
somewhat biased toward those who are more avid consumers
of professional development and perhaps also toward
those who value FAE education most highly. Mr. Whorton
emphasized that aside from this important caveat,
the overall findings have reasonably high levels of
statistical significance, which is generally a function
of total respondents rather than the response rate.
Mr.
Whorton continued, noting that 79% of the respondents
rated FAE good or excellent in the ability to provide
quality professional development and education opportunities.
In respect to networking opportunities, the numbers
collapse indicating that content and quality of FAE
programs are more important for respondents that socializing.
Mr. Schmelkin added that across various state locations
and different product lines, FAE scored high, indicating
that networking is not a major priority at FAE events.
The
biggest surprise, according to Mr. Schmelkin, was
that in myriad details contained in more than 40 pages
of survey results, 42% of respondents were unfamiliar
with the POP program. Mr. Schmelkin’s speculation
that some portion of those unfamiliar with POP would
be respondents from larger accounting firms prompted
agreement from Mr. Martin.
As Mr. Whorton continued his review of the survey,
he reported the following:
-
over the past year 64% attended accounting courses;
59% - taxation courses and; 48% - auditing courses
, the three topics of greatest interest among attendees;
-
individuals who do not attend FAE programs in a
given year are more inclined to learn through reading
and on-line, supporting the conclusion that FAE
should consider diversified delivery methods to
serve those individuals;
-
most learn of FAE events through email, print catalog
and on-line catalogs;
-
the factors which most influence attendance decisions
are relevance of topics to a CPA’s practice
areas; convenience of the time of year; and location;
-
holding a course in Manhattan will increase likelihood
of attendance;
-
most respondents generally prefer a full-day program,
with half-day programs also viewed favorably. Multi-day
programs are too long and programs under 2 hours
too short for most individuals.
At
this point, President Maier opened the floor to questions.
Ms. Cohen asked about the length of on-line programs
are. Mr. Kahn replied that they are shorter than most
seminars, usually an hour or two, which seems appealing
to those who select that from of delivery. Mr. Martin
agreed. Ms. Cohen then asked if nonmembers are on
FAE mailing lists. Mr. Schmelkin added that thousands
of nonmembers are on our mailing lists.. Mr. Kiamie
also stated that full-day programs are his preference
but, AICPA multi-day programs have appeal to him because
of the concurrent sessions.
Mr.
Whorton stated that respondents to the survey feel
that FAE has a well balanced program and good marketing
efforts. He suggested that for the short run, FAE
should review the POP “surprises” and
distance learning alternatives. Mr. Kahn inquired
about pod casts which Mr. Whorton added could be downloaded
off website. Ms. Cohen added that this might lower
direct participation at programs by younger members.
Mr. Whorton countered that there is still a preference
for being around others, face to face. Mr. Jaffee
asked where people are going elsewhere for their educational
needs. Mr. Schmelkin added that some of the other
sources cited by respondents being used to satisfy
their needs are in fact our vendors i.e.: Surgent
McCoy and Nichols Mares CPE. Mr. Jaffee added that
we should strengthen efforts to put our FAE brand
on these types of events, with Mr. Whorton in agreement.
Mr.
Maier encouraged FAE to do more research on distance
learning regarding the advantages and if it’s
a money maker. He added what are the results analogous
to other state society programs. Mr. Schmelkin stated
that we were the first and only state society, so
far, doing this type of survey. Mr. Whorton added
that most states (working with Virginia) are not doing
these surveys but at best just program evaluations.
Mr. Schmelkin stated that he will bring this up at
the AICPA On-Site meeting at the end of February and
ask if other state societies are doing surveys and,
if so, should he share our results? This was approved
by the Board. Mr. Maier added that results of the
survey reinforce and validate that we are doing the
right thing.
Ms.
Cohen suggested that a number of comments reveal that
the price is too high. Mr. Whorton explained that
people will always complain about something but that
doesn’t represent the vast majority. As long
as FAE is doing things like POP and offering value
and content where attendees can turn that education
into more revenue FAE is on the right track. Mr. Schmelkin
reminded the Board that beginning in June, 2008, there
will be a new staff position to work with continuing
on-line training. President Maier suggested that we
look at pricing with other organizations; FAE vs.
AICPA vs. NAA to get useful data.
The
Board thanked Mr. Whorton for his work on the survey
and for his presentation at the conference call meeting.
|
| 3)
Future Meeting Dates: |
Mr.
Schmelkin explained that the next meetings of the
Board will take place on April 17, 2008 at 9:00 am
at the Society offices and May 14, 2008 at 3:00 pm.
He added that the May meeting will likely be by telephone.
The FAE Board meeting on July 13, at The Annual Leadership
Conference at the Turning Stone Resort will begin
at 12:00 noon and end by 2:00 pm.
|
| 4)
November 2007 Financial Highlights: |
Mr. Banerjee stated that FAE is experiencing another
good year and on pace to exceed the performance of
FY 2007, with no contribution to FAE from the Society
during the first six months of FY 2008 in keeping
with the budget. November 2007 unrestricted net revenue
of $188,180K represents a favorable variance to budget
of $191,135; and a favorable variance to FY 2007 of
$133,046. Course revenue, which represents the single
largest source of FAE revenue, has a favorable variance
to budget of $87,440 and a favorable variance to FY
2007 of $230,351. Mr. Banerjee added that FAE seminars
had a favorable variance to budget of $57,000 and
a favorable variance to FY 2007 of $87,000; AICPA
has a favorable variance to budget of $53,000 and
favorable variance to FY 2007 of $89,000. FAE Conferences
showed a favorable variance to budget of $41,000 and
a favorable variance to FY 2007 of $40,000 with other
vendors showing unfavorable variance to budget of
$51,000 and favorable variance to FY 2007 of $95,000.
In-firm showed an unfavorable variance to budget of
$15,000 and a favorable variance to FY 2007 of $13,000.
Chapters showed a favorable variance to budget of
$9,000 and an unfavorable variance to FY 2007 of $15,000.
Cash and cash equivalents were $1,500,000 compared
to $863,000 last fiscal year with investments (restricted)
of $1,800,000 compared to $1,600,000 last fiscal year.
Accounts payable of $110,000 compared to $186,000
in FY 2007 with accrued expenses of $242,000 compared
to $83,000 in FY 2007. Mr. Bloom asked if $32,000
of United Nations (in-firm) is in the budget or not.
Mr. Schmelkin stated the particular client was not
in budget for repeat business but added that FAE is
trying to get them back. Mr. Banerjee noted that this
accounted for the largest part of in-firm sales. President
Maier asked why we look better in unrestricted than
last year. Mr. Banerjee noted that COAP ran a deficit
from June –March 2007. President Maier suggested
we look at COAP. Mr. Banerjee will send out updated
financials. Ms. Cohen made a motion to approve the
financial statements. Mr. Martin seconded the motion
which was approved unanimously by the Board.
|
| 5)
Approval of Minutes: |
Mr.
Martin made a motion to approve the minutes of December
18, 2007 meeting of the Board of Trustees. Mr. Bloom
seconded the motion.
|
| 6)
Adjournment |
With no other issues,
Mr. Jaffee made a motion to adjourn and Ms. Cohen
seconded the motion. President Maier adjourned the
meeting at 11:40 a.m. |
Respectfully submitted,
Scott J. Jaffee, Secretary
|
|
|