|
|  |
 |
 |
The
Future of the Profession
Assessing Priorities in a Changing Environment
MARCH 2008 - Many professions periodically assess their strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) to provide strategic
direction that will mitigate potential problems and capitalize on
available resources. A broad SWOT analysis for the accounting profession
might include:
Strengths
- Financial expertise
- Capability to provide a breadth of services
- Analytical skills for decision making
Weaknesses
- Inadequate communication and critical-thinking skills
- Insufficient anti-fraud education
- Over-reliance on a checklist approach
Opportunities
- Facilitate commerce in the global marketplace
- Broaden client base through new technology
- Enhance the integrity of financial information
- Identify business economic risks
Threats
- Over-regulation
- Litigation risk
- Lack of mobility across state and international borders
- Disconnect between accounting education and practice.
The importance of this last issue prompted The CPA Journal
editors to sponsor a forum in November 2007 titled “Preparing
Future Accounting Professionals,” which brought educators,
practitioners, and regulators together in one room to discuss
the challenges facing the profession from their respective vantage
points. The highlights of the first panel, “How the 150-Hour
Requirement Is Affecting the Profession,” are presented
on page 16, and the second, “How Academics and Practitioners
Can Work Together,” will appear in next month’s issue.
I think you’ll agree that even though the panelists often
disagreed on how best to solve the problems facing the profession,
they all acknowledged that enhanced communication and cooperation
between educators and practitioners are essential. Accounting
professionals need a solid grounding in both theory and practice
in order to succeed in an increasingly complex business environment.
The World of Academe
In classrooms across the country, accounting education takes
place in a vacuum, often isolated from the profession its students
will soon be entering. Professors pat one another on the back
for their most recent research grants, and value academic degrees
above practical experience. Furthermore, many educators conveniently
ignore the reality that accounting is an applied discipline
in a constantly changing environment, one that is being transformed
by technology, global competition, and increased public expectations.
Today, that includes not only knowing international accounting
standards and how they are implemented in different countries,
but also recognizing the diversity of cultures and how that affects
social behavior. Accountants can no longer afford to be mere number-crunchers;
they need to understand what motivates individuals, how to identify
risks, and how to determine a company’s biases. For example,
if a misstatement were to occur, is the company more likely to
overstate net income or to understate it? But how can students
learn about the realities of international business when their
professors are far removed from the world of business?
The Compensation Conundrum
At a recent joint meeting of the Accounting Program Leadership
Group and the Federation of Schools of Accountancy (APLG/FSA),
the attendees, including department chairs and deans of schools
of accountancy, discussed recruiting, retaining, and compensating
accounting educators. With the impending shortage of accounting
PhDs and increasing demand, I recall what my old Economics 101
course taught me: Salaries for this group of job candidates will
likely skyrocket. In fact, one dean shared a story about her college’s
recent attempt to hire an additional faculty member—an accounting
PhD—who summarily turned them down in favor of a $300,000
offer from another college. Paying that salary level to incoming
accounting PhDs would break the budgets of most colleges and universities.
Furthermore, such a move would probably trigger animosity and
resentment among tenured faculty members who have provided loyal
service to the institution for many years and earn far less.
Some colleges have addressed the PhD shortfall by recruiting
foreign nationals from countries such as China. [A significant
increase in the number of professors who identify themselves as
Asian in the membership profiles of the American Accounting Association
(AAA) bears this out.] This solution, however, creates other issues,
not the least of which is the communication challenge associated
with learning a technical subject from a non–native speaker.
The looming shortage of accounting professors could also be seen
as an opportunity, however, to broaden the search for accounting
educators by augmenting the professorial ranks with individuals
from nontraditional, practice-oriented backgrounds. Accounting
educators need to decide their priorities: Do we want professors
who will focus their efforts on research, or teachers who can
best serve our students in the classroom and help future accountants
capitalize on the strengths and opportunities that our profession
has to offer?
As always, I welcome your comments.
Mary-Jo Kranacher, MBA, CPA, CFE
Editor-in-Chief
mkranacher@nysscpa.org
|
|