|
|  |
 |
 |
Backdating
Stock Options
FEBRUARY 2008 - The article “Backdating Employee Stock Options:
Tax Implications” (In Focus, October 2007), contained two
inaccuracies. The authors and editors regret these errors. The
article as published says, on page 27, third column, third full
paragraph: “In the year of grant, the bargain element is
an alternative minimum tax (AMT) adjustment added to taxable income.”
The sentence should read: “In the year of exercise, the
bargain element is an alternative minimum tax (AMT) adjustment
added to taxable income.”
Also, page 28, middle column, second full paragraph reads:
IRC section 409A does not affect options vested and earned
before 2005. Options issued in 2004 and exercised in 2006 or
2007 would, however, be subject to these provisions. Also exempt
are ISOs [incentive stock options] and all NSOs [nonqualified
stock options] granted with an exercise price that is less than
the FMV [fair market value] of the company’s underlying
stock on grant date.
Instead, it should read:
Options issued in 2004 (and not vested in 2004) and exercised
in 2006 or 2007 would, however, be subject to these provisions.
Also exempt are ISOs and all NSOs granted with an exercise price
that is not less than the FMV of the company’s underlying
stock on grant date. |
|
|
 |
|
The
CPA Journal is broadly recognized as an outstanding, technical-refereed
publication aimed at public practitioners, management, educators,
and other accounting professionals. It is edited by CPAs for CPAs.
Our goal is to provide CPAs and other accounting professionals
with the information and news to enable them to be successful
accountants, managers, and executives in today's practice environments.
©2008
The New York State Society of CPAs. Legal
Notices |
|