|
|  |
 |
 |
Highlights
of the New York State 2007/2008 Budget Act
By Mark H. Levin
JUNE 2007 - On
April 9, 2007, Governor Spitzer signed the New York State 2007/2008
Budget Act. One of the shortest in recent history, the Act contains
some major changes to the tax law. Single
Sales Factor Apportionment
In the past
several years, several states have adopted a single sales factor
for corporate tax purposes. The enactment of a single sales factor
in the 2005/2006 Budget Act was intended to encourage out-of-state
corporations to open offices and create employment in New York
State. The use of a single sales factor reduces the tax burden
of out-of-state corporations because neither assets nor payroll
are considered in apportioning entire net income.
The 2005/2006
Budget Act provided for the conversion from a four-factor apportionment
formula to a single sales factor apportionment formula, phased
in over a three-year period, with the full implementation for
taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. The 2007/2008
Budget Act accelerates the implementation of single factor apportionment
so that it is fully effective for taxable years beginning on or
after January 1, 2007.
Business
Tax Rate Reduction
In another
step designed to entice corporations to do business in New York,
the Budget Act reduced the tax rate imposed on net income from
7.5% to 7.1% for corporate franchise, bank, and life insurance
taxpayers.
In addition,
the tax rate imposed on manufacturers (and emerging technology
companies) was further reduced to 6.5% (0.35% lower than the top
personal income tax rate). The alternative minimum tax (AMT) rate
was lowered from 2.5% to 1.5%. The above rate reductions are effective
for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2007.
Corporate
Combined Reporting
Corporations
with substantial intercorporate transactions will be required
to file combined tax returns under the New York State corporate
franchise and insurance tax. New York continues to be a “separate
filing” state, imposing combined reporting only when its
special combined reporting provisions are applicable.
In determining
whether substantial intercorporate transactions exist, the Commissioner
of the Department of Taxation and Finance evaluates all activities
and transactions of a taxpayer and its related corporations. Activities
and transactions that will be considered include, but are not
limited to, the following:
- Manufacturing,
acquiring goods or property, or performing services for related
corporations;
- Selling
goods acquired from related corporations;
- Financing
sales of related corporations;
- Performing
related customer services using common-facilities employees
for related corporations;
- Incurring
expenses that benefit, directly or indirectly, one or more related
corporations; and
- Transferring
assets, including accounts receivable, patents, or trademarks,
from one or more related corporations.
This provision
is effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1,
2007. The single factor formula does not apply to the metropolitan
commuter transportation district surcharge, which will continue
to use the three-factor formula.
Personal
Service Corporations or S Corporations
The 2007/2008
Budget Act includes a provision for tax abuse involving personal
service corporations or S corporations. It permits the Commissioner
of the Department of Taxation and Finance to completely or partially
disregard a personal service corporation formed to receive a partner’s
distribution from a New York State partnership if such a corporation
was formed to avoid New York personal income tax.
Under this
provision, the commissioner may allocate all income, deductions,
credits, exclusions, and other allowances between such a personal
service or S corporation (even if the corporation is taxed under
Tax Law Article 9-A or is not subject to tax in New York State)
and its employee-owners if such allocation is necessary to prevent
avoidance or evasion of New York State personal income tax, or
in order to clearly reflect the source and amount of the income
of the personal service corporation or S corporation or any of
its employee-owners.
These provisions
are effective for taxable years beginning on or after January
1, 2007.
Highway
Use Tax
To comply
with federal law, a highway use tax certificate of registration
is replacing the highway use tax permit. The new highway use tax
certificate of registration takes effect on July 1, 2007, subject
to transition provisions for existing registrations.
Captive
REITs and RICs
Under the
Budget Act, the 60% dividend exclusion for dividends received
by captive real estate investment trusts (REIT) and regulated
investment companies (RIC) will be eliminated over a five-year
period for banks with assets in excess of $8 billion.
Additionally,
any corporate franchise Article 9-A taxpayer that has a captive
REIT or RIC subsidiary will be required to include such REITs
and RICs on a combined franchise tax return. These provisions
are effective for taxable years beginning on or after January
1, 2007.
Provisions
for Banks
The Budget
Act extended for two years (through 2010) provisions related to
the 1985 Bank Tax Reform Act and the transitional provisions under
the bank tax related to the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of
1999.
Bank investment
subsidiaries that have elected to be subject to the general business
franchise tax under Article 9-A will be deemed to have revoked
the election as of the first day of the taxable year in which
any of the following conditions apply:
- The corporation
ceases to be an Article 9-A taxpayer;
- The corporation
becomes subject to the fixed-dollar minimum tax under Article
9-A;
- The corporation
has no wages or receipts allocable to New York State or is otherwise
inactive (this provision will not apply to a corporation actively
engaged in a trade or business, or when substantially all of
the assets of a corporation are stock and securities of corporations
directly or indirectly controlled by it and engaged in the active
conduct of a trade or business);
- 65% or
more of the voting stock of the corporation becomes owned or
controlled directly or indirectly by a corporation that acquired
the stock in a transaction (or series of related transactions)
that qualifies as a purchase within the meaning of IRC section
338(H)(3) [unless the acquired corporation and the acquiring
corporation were, immediately prior to the purchase, members
of the same affiliated group under IRC section 1504 without
regard to the exclusions under IRC section 1504(B)]; or
- The corporation,
in a transaction or series of related transactions, acquires
assets, whether by contribution, purchase, or other means, having
an average value [determined under New York Tax Law section
210(2)], or, if greater, a total tax basis in excess of 40%
of the average value, or, if greater, the total tax basis of
all the assets of the corporation immediately prior to such
an acquisition; and as a result of such an acquisition, the
corporation is principally engaged in a business that is different
from the business immediately prior to such an acquisition,
provided that such different business is described in Tax Law
section 1452(a)(I), (II), or (III) (related to the business
of banking).
Corporations
that meet one of the above conditions will then be subject to
the bank tax. This provision is effective for taxable years beginning
on or after January 1, 2007.
Mark
H. Levin, CPA, is manager, state and local taxes, at H.J.
Behrman & Company, LLP, New York, N.Y. He is a member and past
chair of the NYSSCPA’s New York, Multistate and Local Taxation
Committee, and a member of The CPA Journal Editorial Board. |
|