| Twists
in Determining New York State Taxable Income
Complexities of Interest on U.S. Government Obligations
and SUNY Pension Contributions
By Gary P. Briggs
FEBRUARY
2007 - Few things are more disconcerting to an individual
taxpayer than receiving a letter from the tax authorities,
be it the IRS or the New York State Department of Taxation
and Finance, indicating an error in one’s tax return.
Most individuals, including those who use a tax preparer,
spend an inordinate amount of time making certain their tax
information is correct. Any tax preparer knows that it is
difficult to stay abreast of every nuance in the tax law.
Two fairly new twists, related to interest income and retirement
income, must be handled properly on an individual’s
New York State tax return in order to prevent big headaches
later on.
Tax-Free Interest Income
When is tax-free interest income not tax-free? When it
is part of a regulated investment company’s portfolio.
As a general rule, interest accruing to individuals on
U.S. government bonds and obligations is taxable at the
federal level and exempt at the state level. And while this
statement is true in most jurisdictions, tax preparers in
New York (as well as California and Connecticut) must be
aware of the special tax rules in these states.
While interest accruing to individuals on most U.S. government
obligations received directly by New York taxpayers was
always exempt from New York State taxes, such interest received
indirectly through regulated investment companies was not.
Prior to 1986, individuals filing personal income tax returns
in New York were required to pay tax on all income accruing
from a regulated investment company, regardless of its source.
To remedy this inequity between those who invest directly
in U.S. government obligations and those who invest indirectly
in the same obligations through a regulated investment company,
the New York legislature amended section 612(c) of the New
York State Tax Law in 1986. The law does contain some significant
limitations, however.
The 50% rule. Since 1986, individuals
filing personal tax returns in New York State have been
able to exclude the interest earned on U.S. obligations
that
accrued through regulated investment companies from their
taxable income, but only if the regulated investment company
(or, as is usually the case, a designated fund of the company)
meets the 50% U.S. obligations asset requirement stated
in section 612(c)(1) of the New York State Tax Law. For
a particular fund of a regulated investment company to meet
this 50% rule, at least 50% of the total dollar value of
all investments held by the fund at the close of each quarter
must be in U.S. obligations deemed exempt from state and
local tax. Regulated investment companies must meet the
50% rule at the end of each quarter for any
of the interest earned for the fund to be exempt from New
York taxation.
Interest received from the fund of a regulated investment
company that meets the 50% rule is exempt from New York
State taxation to the extent that the interest is a percentage
of the total distribution of the regulated investment company
fund. For example, if interest from U.S. obligations represents
45% of the total interest income earned by a regulated investment
company fund during the year, then 45% of the income received
from that regulated investment company’s fund is exempt
from taxation. The remaining 55% will be taxable on the
individual’s state tax return. The 50% rule is based
on the total asset value of the fund, not the total interest
income earned by the fund.
While New York made a serious effort to correct the inequity
within its tax laws, the 1986 amendment of section 612(c)(1)
does not completely eliminate the problem. Funds of regulated
investment companies holding less than 50% of their value
in U.S. obligations receive no benefit under the current
law. It is imperative that interest income received from
any fund of a regulated investment company meet the 50%
rule at the end of each quarter for any of the interest
in the regulated investment company’s fund to be exempt
from New York State taxation.
Retirement Income
When is a pension, received by a New York resident from
a State University of New York (SUNY) institution, not
completely excludable from New York State taxation? When
that “SUNY institution” is a private corporation.
New York State residents who receive pension benefits
from the federal government, or from any New York state
or local government, may exclude 100% of that income from
New York State taxation. The Department of Taxation and
Finance includes both SUNY and CUNY colleges within their
definition of New York State government institutions. It
is a little-known fact, however, that, for example, one
prominent “SUNY institution” isn’t a state
institution at all. The Research Foundation of the State
University of New York is “a private, nonprofit educational
corporation that administers externally funded contracts
and grants for and on behalf of the State University of
New York” (www.rfsuny.org).
Retirees from the SUNY Research Foundation are, thus, limited
to the traditional $20,000 exclusion relative to such pension
benefits. Tax preparers working with “SUNY retirees”
should inquire as to exactly which SUNY institution the
individual has retired from.
While this particular scenario may be limited, it is symptomatic
of a more pervasive twist: While pension contributions made
by SUNY or CUNY colleges are not taxable to New York State
residents, pension contributions received from any other
college are limited to the $20,000 exclusion.
Many college faculty are, or were, enrolled in the Teacher’s
Insurance Annuity Association–College Retirement Equities
Fund (TIAA-CREF); unlike most retirement plans, TIAA-CREF
is transferable from college to college. So while individuals
may have retired from a SUNY/CUNY institution, not all of
their pension contributions were necessarily made by a SUNY/CUNY
institution. It is up to the tax preparer to determine exactly
which institutions contributed to the individual’s
TIAA-CREF retirement fund and what percentage of the total
retirement distributions received is related to SUNY/CUNY
institutions. A tax preparer can contact TIAA-CREF for this
information. The author knows from personal experience that
the New York State Division of Taxation and Finance is looking
very closely at taxpayers who deduct 100% of their TIAA-CREF
distributions as coming from a New York State institution.
While all of this SUNY/CUNY confusion may be a bit of
a nuisance at tax time, a little extra investigation then
will save a lot of headaches later. Tax preparers should
also remember that TIAA-CREF distributions received from
institutions other than SUNY/CUNY are still excludable from
New York state taxation up to a maximum of $20,000.
Gary P. Briggs, CPA, is an associate
professor of accounting in the department of business administration
and economics at the State University of New York–College
at Brockport. |