| IRS
Issues Proposed Regulations on the Domestic Production Activities
Deduction
By
Cheryl Cornwell
MAY 2006 - The
Domestic Production Activities Deduction under IRC section
199 originated with the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
On January 19, 2005, IRS Notice 2005-14 provided interim
guidance on IRC section 199. In response to more than 80
public comment letters, the proposed regulations further
clarify and define the many complicated rules covered by
section 199. On October 20, 2005, the IRS published proposed
regulations effective for tax years beginning after December
31, 2004. Until the final regulations are published, taxpayers
may rely on the guidance in Notice 2005-14 and on the proposed
regulations. The proposed regulations closely follow the
provisions of Notice 2005-14; however, some additions and
changes further clarify and reaffirm the original notice.
Overview
of the Domestic Production Activities Deduction
The
IRC section 199 deduction is equal to 3% of qualified production
activities income of the taxpayer in tax years 2005 and
2006, 6% in 2007 through 2009, and 9% in 2010 and thereafter;
if taxable income is less than this amount, then the deduction
is equal to taxable income. Additionally, the deduction
is limited to 50% of the W-2 wages paid by the taxpayer
for that taxable year.
The
activities eligible for the deduction include not only the
manufacture of personal property but also software development;
film and music production; the production of water, natural
gas, and electricity; and construction, engineering, and
architectural activities and services.
Clarifications
from the Proposed Regulations
Application
on an item-by-item basis. The proposed regulations
confirmed the guidance in Notice 2005-14, which states that
IRC section 199 must be applied on an item-by-item basis,
even though doing so is unduly burdensome. The IRS believes
that taxpayers might otherwise receive benefits for gross
receipts that do not qualify. The proposed regulations in
certain cases allow portions of an item (e.g., the portion
of software produced in the United States) to qualify.
Treatment
of advance payments. The proposed regulations
clarify that when gross receipts and corresponding expenses
are recognized in different taxable years, taxpayers must
take the receipts and expenses into account, for the purposes
of IRC section 199, in the taxable year in which the items
are recognized under the methods of accounting for federal
income tax purposes. The IRS believes that it would be unduly
burdensome and complicated to create a separate set of timing
rules for section 199.
Net
operating losses. The proposed regulations
further clarify that the IRC section 199 deduction is not
taken into account in computing taxable income when determining
the amount of a net operating loss carryback or carryforward
under IRC section 172(b)(2). With limited exceptions, the
section 199 deduction can neither create nor increase the
amount of an NOL carryback or carryforward.
Wages.
The proposed regulations clarify that neither self-employment
income nor guaranteed payments to partners qualify as W-2
income for purposes of determining the IRC section 199 deduction.
The
nonduplication rule continues to provide that amounts that
are treated as W-2 wages in one year cannot be treated as
W-2 wages in another taxable year. In addition, the same
W-2 wages cannot be claimed by more than one taxpayer for
the purposes of section 199.
Related
parties. IRC section 199(c)(7) states that
domestic production gross receipts do not include any gross
receipts of the taxpayer derived from property leased, licensed,
or rented by the taxpayer for use by any related person.
The proposed regulations continue to include the exception
from this general rule; that is, the provision is not intended
to apply to a related party if the property held by that
related party is held for sublease to, or is subleased to,
an unrelated party for the ultimate use of an unrelated
party.
IRC
section 263A treatment. The proposed regulations
provide that a taxpayer that has manufactured, produced,
grown, or extracted qualifying production property for the
taxable year should treat itself as a producer under IRC
section 263A with respect to the qualifying property, unless
the taxpayer is not subject to the section 263A capitalization
rules. A taxpayer whose manufactured, produced, grown, or
extracted activity is exempt from section 263A is not required
to change its method of accounting under section 263A for
the purposes of section 199.
Construction
activities. The proposed regulations define
the term “construction” to mean the construction
or erection of real property by a taxpayer that is in a
trade or business that is considered construction for the
purposes of the North American Industry Classification System
(NAICS). The proposed regulations clarify that in order
for a taxpayer to be considered in an NAICS construction
code, it must be engaged in a construction trade or business
(but which is not necessarily its primary trade or business)
on a regular and ongoing basis.
A taxpayer
must actually perform construction activities in order to
qualify for the IRC section 199 deduction. If all the work
is contracted out, the gross receipts will not qualify as
domestic production gross receipts even though the taxpayer
is in the construction business.
Gross
receipts attributable to land sales generally cannot be
treated as domestic production gross receipts from real
property construction. However, the proposed regulations
provide a safe harbor method under which the gross receipts
attributable to land are calculated by adding a markup percentage
to land costs. This percentage is based on the number of
years the land is held (5% for up to 5 years, 10% for years
6 through 10, and 15% for years 11 through 15). The safe
harbor is not allowed for land held for 16 or more years.
Other
Provisions
Allocation
of costs of goods sold. The proposed regulations
clarify that if a taxpayer does, or can, without undue burden
or expense, specifically identify from its books and records
the costs of goods sold allocable to domestic production
gross receipts (DPGR), the cost of goods sold allocable
to DPGR is that amount, irrespective of whether the taxpayer
uses another allocation method to allocate gross receipts
between DPGR and other gross receipts.
Allocation
and apportionment of deductions. The proposed
regulations are consistent with Notice 2005-14, in that
they continue to provide three methods for allocating and
apportioning deductions. The first method, the IRC section
861 method, must be used by a taxpayer, unless the taxpayer
is eligible and chooses to use either the simplified deduction
method or the small business simplified overall method.
The rules of section 861 have significance when determining
which income or deductions are considered from within the
United States and which are from outside the U.S.
Second,
a business taxpayer may use the simplified deduction method
if it has average annual gross receipts of $25 million or
less, or total assets at the end of the taxable year of
$10 million or less.
Finally,
a qualifying small business taxpayer may use the small business
simplified overall method to apportion cost of goods sold
and deductions to domestic production gross receipts. The
proposed regulations provide that a qualifying small business
taxpayer is a taxpayer that meets one of the following conditions:
-
It has both average annual gross receipts of $5 million
or less, and cost of goods sold and deductions (excluding
NOL deductions and deductions not attributable to the
conduct of a trade or business) for the current taxable
year of $5 million or less;
- It
is engaged in a trade or business of farming that is not
required to use the accrual method under IRC section 447;
or
- It
is eligible to use the cash method as provided in Revenue
Procedure 2002-28.
The
apportionment under the last two methods is generally based
on relative gross receipts.
Pass-through
entities. The proposed regulations make it
clear that an owner of a pass-through entity does not need
to be engaged directly in the entity’s trade or business
in order to claim an IRC section 199 deduction on the basis
of that owner’s share of the entity’s pass-through
items.
The
proposed regulations also make it clear that when determining
its section 199 deduction, an owner of a pass-through entity
aggregates items of income and expense from the entity (including
W-2 wages) with its own items of income and expense (including
W-2 wages) for purposes of allocating and apportioning deductions
to DPGR.
An
owner’s share of W-2 wages for purposes of determining
the owner’s 50% W-2 wage limit is the lesser of its
allocable share of the wages or of double the applicable
percentage (3% in 2005 and 2006, 6% for 2007 through 2009,
9% thereafter) of allocated qualified production activities
income.
Alternative
minimum tax. In accordance with IRC section
199(d)(6), the proposed regulations provide that, for purposes
of determining alternative taxable income under IRC section
55, a taxpayer that is not a corporation may deduct an amount
equal to the applicable percentage (3% in 2005 and 2006,
6% for 2007 through 2009, 9% thereafter) of the lesser of
the taxpayer’s qualified production activities income
for the taxable year or the taxpayer’s taxable income
for the taxable year determined without regard to the section
199 deduction. In the case of an individual, adjusted gross
income is used for the limitation on taxable income. A corporation,
however, is limited to the applicable percentage of qualified
production activities income or the alternative minimum
taxable income determined without regard to the section
199 deduction. For purposes of computing the alternative
minimum taxable income, the qualified production activities
income is computed without any adjustments under IRC sections
56 through 59. The amount of the section 199 deduction for
any taxable year is still limited to 50% of the W-2 wages
of the employer for the taxable year.
Cheryl
Cornwell, CPA, CFP, is a director of tax/vice president
of Sanderson and Company, Buffalo, N.Y.
|