| Securing
Document Management Systems: Call for Standards, Leadership
By
Joe Harpaz
JULY 2005
-As companies become more reliant upon “paperless”
electronic document management technologies, there is increasing
need for those who manage this data to expand their knowledge
base and implement security standards so that data cannot
be compromised. For some, this means hiring full-time, in-house
staff to manage security features, or expanding the role of
existing IT resources. For others, retaining an outside vendor
that can provide this type of expertise, including software,
hardware, and maintenance, is easier and less expensive. Whichever
option a company chooses, it should become more involved in
setting the standards for the security of client financial
data. What
Makes a System Secure?
Many
businesses think that information that is housed off-site
and managed by an outside firm is less secure. In reality,
most electronic data management companies are extremely
stringent about security measures. They will secure the
entire system, scan for vulnerabilities, provide back-up
solutions, and update and maintain software regularly.
Many
software and database applications originally designed to
be run on internal networks, with security on a very basic
functionality level. Increasingly, corporated networks are
now connected to the Internet, making them (and the applications
on the network) potentially available to an intruder. If
these systems are not consistently updated and maintained
with proper security features, a network may be exposed
to outside vulnerabilities.
When
assessing security risks, the company should look at every
layer of the system: the program (e.g., document management
software), the network (e.g., firewalls), and the operating
system (e.g., Microsoft Windows). Any gaps in these layers
and the company is at risk.
Where
data reside—in-house, on a network, or on the Internet—has
little to do with security. The key is to maintain procedures
and manage security updates on an ongoing basis. For example,
Microsoft provides almost daily updates on vulnerabilities
in its systems and on how to patch and update the systems.
But if no one in a company is implementing these updates
daily, the data are vulnerable. Vendors that publicly post
their security vulnerabilities inherently expose themselves
to those risks as they become known and accessible to those
looking to leverage weaknesses.
Surprisingly,
the majority of information theft in corporations is committed
by employees, not by outsiders or so-called hackers. According
to a survey reported by MSNBC technology correspondent Bob
Sullivan in May 2004, as much as 70% of all identity theft
starts with the theft of personal data from a company by
an employee. Many businesses fail to consider this when
examining their electronic information systems. Having an
in-house IT administrator with access to everything within
the company’s data banks may present a major source
of risk.
Basic
guidelines for managing a secure network and application
environment include the following:
-
Stringent policies and procedures;
-
Physical security, including setting limitations for equipment
and network access;
-
Ongoing efforts to update, patch, and maintain all components
to applications so all known vulnerabilities are fixed
regularly;
-
Vulnerability estimates, including regular scans of the
entire system, for errors or configurations that could
present security “holes”; and
-
Management of audit trails and audit logs to monitor access
to information for indicators of unusual activity or intrusions.
The
International Standards Organization (ISO) 17799 standards,
released in December 2000, provide a starting point for
security for companies managing sensitive data. The over-80-page
document outlines a code of practice for information security,
corporate networks, and application development that is
emerging as a widely recognized standard worldwide. The
ISO rules are a great tool to introduce awareness into a
company; however, they do not necessarily solve all of the
critical issues. This guide is very comprehensive and identifies
key security issues, such as:
-
Information security policy;
-
Organizational security, infrastructure, and third-party
access;
-
Asset classification and control;
-
Personnel security;
-
Physical and environmental security;
-
Communications and operations management;
-
Access control;
-
Systems development and control;
-
Business continuity; and
-
Compliance.
Companies
looking at internal security should familiarize themselves
with ISO 17799. At minimum, those responsible for technology
decisions should ask targeted questions about security.
For example: Does the IT staff follow the ISO or similar
rules? What is the vendor doing about application security?
Accounting
firms bear the responsibility for ensuring the security
of client data, and although some firms may have the knowledge
and resources to successfully maintain in-house applications,
such as a document management system, they should consider
a web-based or application service provider (ASP) model,
in which the vendor provides and maintains the application.
In doing this, the CPA firm should also ensure that the
vendor provides effective security measures. For example,
systems that are maintained in secure data centers can provide
multiple layers of physical and electronic security that
simply aren’t feasible for accounting firms to maintain.
There are other security measures to consider: Does the
vendor provide third-party vulnerability reviews to examine
and evaluate their systems and to implement additional layers
of security? Does the vendor provide ongoing monitoring
to protect and prevent violations of security and ensure
business continuity during disasters?
Joe
Harpaz is executive vice president and cofounder
of Immediatech Corporation (www.immediatech.com),
which provides web-hosted document management solutions for
CPA firms.
|